Accelerating open access: what is missing from Plan S

R
Research Publishing
By: Steven Inchcoombe, Sat Dec 23 2017
Steven Inchcoombe

Author: Steven Inchcoombe

Chief Publishing Officer at Springer Nature

Last week Science Europe announced the launch of cOAlition S – a group of 11 national research funding organisations in Europe who have all signed up to the following principle: From 1 January 2020, scientific publications on the results from research funded by public grants provided by national and European research councils and funding bodies, must be published in compliant Open Access Journals or on compliant Open Access Platforms. It has also received support from the European Commission.  

tools_01 © Photo by Iker Urteaga on Unsplash

I have already explained here why I am firmly of the view that hybrid journals are crucial to advancing the move towards open access and welcome the acknowledgement of this from cOAlition S in their statement “We acknowledge that ‘transformative’ type of agreements, where subscription fees are offset against publication fees, may contribute to accelerate the transition to full Open Access”.  It was also welcome to see their invitation to join the coalition extended to other stakeholders, notably researchers, universities, libraries and publishers.  It is really only by all working together that we can achieve, in the coalition’s words, “our vision of science without publication paywalls”. 

However, as the plan stands, it fails to take into account several principles that are, in our view, fundamental to ensuring that the transition to OA is sustainable for the whole research community, not just the part of it funded by the 11 organisations currently signed up to the coalition.

  1. Research and the communication of it is global and changes in publishing models in one part of the world need to take into account other regions.  As an international publisher working with authors around the world, helping them ensure that their work is the best it can be, that it is able to stand up to academic scrutiny, and ultimately can be discovered, shared, used and reused by the widest possible audience, we have an obligation to ensure researchers, no matter where they are based or how they are funded, can have their research published.  An extensive and growing open access portfolio is one important way we do this, but we need to continue to deliver on high demand for subscription content around the world. cOAlition S’s proposal, as it is currently drafted, attempts to enforce mandates in isolation, without taking into account the global nature of research and could significantly harm researchers from countries whose funding bodies are unprepared to fund immediate OA.  This fact, that shifting from a subscription to an open-access business model around the world could bring a new challenge — how scientists in poorer nations will be able to afford to publish open-access work, has also been pointed out by researchers in Nature.
  2. An international consensus from research funding bodies is needed as to the preferred publishing model.  This lack of agreement is requiring international publishers, for the reasons outlined above, to maintain and develop several models adding both cost and complexity for all. While Plan S seems to favour pure open access publications, there remains strong demand from authors and funders for a variety of models. Highly selective subscription journals play an important role in meeting the communication needs of researchers, and due to their high rejection rates and significant editorial investment the subscription model is currently the fairest way to provide sustainable and widespread access to them. Hybrid journals are an efficient model to expand choice within the publishing system while there is no global consensus on how open access should be achieved.
  3. Progress on the transition to OA is likely to be much faster with the support of researchers, rather than against them. Academic independence and the ability for authors to have choice over where they publish their research must be retained.  Mandating that funded authors can only publish in ‘compliant’ OA journals strikes at the heart of this independence. Now, we don’t yet know what ‘compliant’ will mean and this is something we would like to discuss with cOAlition S, but it was interesting that many comments took note of this issue especially since cOAlition S only referred to revising the incentive and reward system of science in a general paragraph. Funding organisations, such as DFG, have also raised concerns, believing that such open access mandates could potentially lead to increased article processing charges (APC), and involve “fundamental changes to the system by which reputation is created and research success is rewarded away from indicators such as journal impact factors”, the insinuation being that making such a sweeping change independent of change in other areas could be incredibly damaging and disruptive.  

No-one is saying that the current system is perfect but for the reasons highlighted above a range of publishing options, hybrid as well as highly selective subscription journals, are needed in order to meet the communication needs of researchers.  They provide both author choice and geographic-blindness at a time when there is no international consensus from governments or funders as to how the publishing of research will be funded in the future.  We understand the need to move faster towards a point where publicly-funded research is openly available at the point of publication and as the leading OA publisher believe we have done more than any other publisher to make this a reality. With OA options on over 2,500 journals already on offer, close to 600 pure-OA journals, and the fact that we are responsible for 30% of all immediately accessible OA articles, we are very attuned to the challenges of transitioning to open access and therefore believe we speak from a position of experience.  We look forward to sharing our experience with Science Europe, the European Commission and members of cOAlition S and working together to make OA a reality.

Steven Inchcoombe

Author: Steven Inchcoombe

Chief Publishing Officer at Springer Nature

Steven Inchcoombe read Physics at Merton College, Oxford and qualified as a chartered accountant with PwC. From 1990 to 2000, Steven was at Interactive Data Corporation, where he ultimately became responsible for strategy, M&A and the EMEA region, and during this period the business became listed on NASDAQ. He then moved on to Board positions with the Financial Times Group, including UK Publisher of the Financial Times and Managing Director of ft.com. 

Steven joined the Macmillan Board in 2006. From 2007 to 2013, he led the Nature Publishing Group (NPG), and in 2013 became CEO of Macmillan’s Science and Scholarly division, comprising NPG, Scientific American and Palgrave Macmillan. Following the creation of Springer Nature in May 2015 he was appointed Managing Director of its Nature Research Group and most recently promoted to Chief Publishing Officer for Springer Nature in March 2016.

Related Tags:

Previous posts

Transformative deals substantially aid the transition to OA. Let’s give them the time they need to do so.

Last month, Springer Nature agreed a new transformative ‘read and publish’ deal with the Norwegian library consortium, Unit.  This, coupled with renewals of existing deals in the UK (Jisc), Sweden (Bibsam) and Qatar, takes the number of such deals we have into double figures, the most of any publisher.  These deals enable researchers in these ten countries to publish open access in over 1900 Springer journals as well as read the research of others across this portfolio.

O
Openaccess
02 Aug 2019
The future of open access books

Open access book publishing has been growing in recent years. The Directory of Open Access Books (DOAB) lists 2,099 open access books published in 2018, an increase of 38% from 2017. Funders are also starting to engage with open access for books: a small number of European funders now mandate open access for books and provide financial support for open access book publication. COAlition S has also indicated that they support transitioning monographs to open access, and will provide guidance by the end of 2021.

O
Openaccess
18 Jun 2019
Maximising the benefits of early sharing

At Springer Nature making great research available as quickly as possible is a central part of our commitment to the research community. 

Springer Nature Group
23 May 2019
A faster path to an open future

At Springer Nature we want to find the fastest and most effective route to immediate open access (OA) for all primary research.

Springer Nature Group
08 May 2019
Congratulations to Karen Keskulla Uhlenbeck

It’s a great pleasure for us at Springer Nature to congratulate Karen Keskulla Uhlenbeck for the award of this year’s Abel Prize.

Springer Nature Group
03 Mar 2019
Businesses must play a role in sustainable development

Today Springer Nature launches its Responsible Business report for 2018.

Springer Nature Group
27 Mar 2019
Setting targets at Springer Nature to help create a better balance

The theme of this year’s IWD couldn’t be more relevant to us. Last month, Springer Nature’s management board announced to our 13,000 colleagues that we will set a target to improve gender representation in our leadership group.

Springer Nature Group
07 Mar 2019
Without you, we are nothing: why community engagement is at the core of everything we do

Sometimes there is great value in stating the obvious; the scholarly publishing industry would not exist without a broad international community of researchers, students, librarians, funders, and commercial partners.

R
Research Publishing
06 Mar 2019
Need to focus on demand as well as supply: making Plan S work for all

Steven Inchcoombe discusses Springer Nature's submission to the cOAlition of participants to make Plan S work for all.

R
Research Publishing
11 Feb 2019
A postcard from Davos: what role for research at this gathering of global opinion leaders?

My first impressions of Davos? Dazzling, overwhelming, unexpected, thought-provoking, incredibly busy and much, much more…

R
Research Publishing
04 Apr 2019
How Can We Accelerate Data Sharing?

What steps can publishers, funders and institutions take to make data sharing worth a researcher’s time and energy, and accelerate progress? 

R
Research Publishing
10 Mar 2019
Connecting curious minds to advance learning and discovery

Science

Springer Nature will stay curious, connect ideas, question how things are done, explore new ways to deliver for our communities and then make the changes that matter.

R
Research Publishing
20 Feb 2019
The quest for more value – challenges of the scientific ecosystem in the absence of coordination: A Long Read

Research News

Daniel Ropers shares some of his early observations about the academic publishing industry.

R
Research Publishing
01 Nov 2018
Publication misconduct: changing the conversation

Suzanne Farley discusses how to increase prevention and detection of research and publication misconduct. 

R
Research Publishing
04 Nov 2018
Lessons learned from open peer review: a publisher’s perspective

Research News

Rachel Burley discusses BMC's history in openness and transparency and what has been learnt.

R
Research Publishing
23 Dec 2017
Accelerating open access: what is missing from Plan S

Research News

The transition to open access needs to be sustainable for the whole research community.

R
Research Publishing
23 Dec 2017
Finding the science in social media

Research News

At Springer Nature we believe that social media is a vital tool for everyone involved in the academic research and publishing process. 

R
Research Publishing
23 Dec 2017
Hybrid journals can advance the move towards full open access

Blogs

Hybrid journals play an important role in the transition to open access.

R
Research Publishing
01 Aug 2018
Science benefits from diversity – and as publishers we have a role to play

As a progressive publisher, we have a responsibility to support diversity and inclusion.

R
Research Publishing
17 Jul 2018
What next for Impact Factors?

Why we need to work together to create metrics that better meet the needs of the research community.

R
Research Publishing
02 Jul 2018
Can research change the world?

Springer Nature believes that great multidisciplinary research needs to be informing global discussions.  

R
Research Publishing
28 Jun 2018
We need to do more to celebrate and support women in engineering

Women’s achievements in STEM fields need to be harnessed to raise awareness, create role models and foster a more inclusive culture. 

R
Research Publishing
21 Jun 2018
Future of the book all down to definition

Advancing discovery

The speed of recent change in the publishing industry in the past 10 years poses the question, what will book publishing look like in the future?

R
Research Publishing